Friday, May 31, 2013

10 Examples of E&B Natural Rescources Management Incompetence & Arrogance

KCAL9 CBS Story "Oil Drilling Proposal in Hermosa Beach"

Stacey Armato, Michael Collins from StopHermosaBeachOil.com
No Comment From E&B Natural Resources
E&B did not comment on this story because news publicity is last they want in the Los Angeles area. E&B is attempting to take advantage of a vulnerable town and quietly drill into the Santa Monica Bay without waking up the powerful media groups that will make this a huge National story. The oil drilling proposal is not a story about 18,000 Hermosa Beach residents but more about maintaining the lifestyle of 11 million people that enjoy the cool breezes from Santa Monica Bay.  Its about jeapardizing the integrity of thousands of plugged oil wells under homes in Redondo Beach, Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach that could leak and explode if they are come under pressure from new hydraulic drilling nearby.

This illegal settlement agreement was constructed by Hermosa Beach City Council Member Kit Bobko and he is obviously nervous in this video above doing his first TV interview on the topic.  He will be forced to defend the illegal Hermosa Beach oil settlement it in order to save his political career.  Look at Kit Bobko's horrendous environmental voting record.  Watch these videos below which show Hermosa Beach City Council hypocrisy, lies, deception & intimidation.



Thursday, May 30, 2013

Jeff Duclos Says, "E&B Natural Resources Shows A Shocking Level of Management Incompetence"



Hermosa Beach City Council Member Jeff Duclos says we should be upset with E&B Natural Resources and the shocking level of management incompetence. They took no responsibility for the lack of oversight pulling a drilling permit and DID NOT apologize for their error.



Former City Council Member Michael Keegan says, E&B has proven so incompetent they can't even pull a proper drilling permit and why isn't the City Council upset? Why isn't Hermosa Beach looking for a new oil drilling applicant?

New Erin Brockovich & Promised Land Movie Be Written In Hermosa Beach

Did Hermosa Beach City Council Members Get Paid Off?

Hermosa Beach City Council oil drilling silence looks just like the movies Erin Brockovich & Promised Land.  Your silence doesn't allow us to have a proper dialog or debate as leaders of our City.  Your silence makes us suspicious and looks like you have been paid off.  If someone wanted to set up a house of prostitution in Hermosa Beach would you be impartial to that?  

Hermosa Beach City Council Members Took An Oath To Protect & Serve Its' Residents

    
Hermosa Beach City Council Members Took An Oath To Protect & Serve

Chris Miller (Daughter of Famous Ski Movie producer Warren Miller) delivers a power speech to the City Council.  "You took at oath of office to protect and serve its' residents.  This is not what Hermosa Beach stands for and I do not want to be owned by an oil company.  The California Tide Lands Trust was founded to protected the Coastal areas above the surface and was not developed to sell out what is below the surface."

E&B Natural Resources is Publishing "Half-Truths" in South Bay Newspapers

E&B Natural Resources is publishing "half-truths" in South Bay Newspapers

Former Hermosa Beach City Council Member JR Revitsky has been involved with the oil drilling issue for decades.  Steve Layton is poisoning the well and should have to wait until all the studies are done before publishing his propaganda and half truths.  Poisoning the well is not playing fair!  He asks how do we stop it? 

Why I Don't Trust E&B Natural Resources or The Hermosa Beach City Council

Watch This Incredible Speech from Patti Sousa
"Why I Don't Trust E&B Natural Resources or the Hermosa Beach City Council" 

There Is No Way An Oil Drilling Vote Will Ever Pass in Hermosa Beach


Lou Morris of Hermosa Beach says, ""There is no way an oil drilling vote will ever pass in Hermosa Beach.
"So many people have commented on the stupidity of our City Government. Parents give lots of money to the schools each year and there is no way they will sacrifice the safety for oil drilling. Newspapers write at an 8th grade level and we are making this way too complicated."  

Why Is The City of Hermosa Beach Rushing The EIR & Public Meeting Process?

Land & Coastal Use Planning Process is 3 Years Minimum 

Hermosa Beach City Council Member Pete Tucker asks Tom Bakaly at 2 minutes into this video a very important question.  He asks why are we rushing the EIR process into a 6-9 month timeline when the Land and Coastal planning documentation takes 3 years minimum.  

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Is The City of Hermosa Beach Hiding Oil Related Expenses?


(Please excuse my typos below)

3)  Request for clarification as to where/how the City is specifically keep track of the accumulating city expenditures which are not being reimbursed by E&B Natural Resources as related to the likely 2014 oil ballot measure.  

When the settlement agreement between the parties was announced in March of 2012, it was indicated that E&B Natural Resources would be paying essentially all of the costs leading to an election for the purposed of determining if the people of Hermosa Beach would lift the City's ban on oil drilling.  

Later it was announced that city staff time utilized for all additional work related to preparation for an election would be reimbursed by E&B at an amount equal to 10% of the cost of the EIR preparation.  And further it was indicated that E&B would cover the costs of obtaining the EIR, and would pay not more than $50,000 of the actual election costs.  

Since then the Council has approved hiring (at the City expense) consultants to do such things as the City's own "Economic Study", and for a "Community Dialog" process (some or much of which "Community Dialogue" will be oil drilling related according to the RFP for that consultant.) 

There appears to be a significant amount of staff time being expended daily on various aspects of oil drilling.  Thus, if the EIR preparation costs amounted to $800,000 in total, that would mean E&B would only be reimbursing the City $80,000 for all of its cots for consultants, meetings, reports, attorney fees, staff time and on and on for the extraneous activities leading to the oil drilling election.  

The people were essentially told by the Council that the oil litigation was over and that their only costs going forward would be one of the following:  
  • If the electorate approved oil drilling at an election then the City's obligation to E&B would be $3.5M, plus the City's own costs ongoing attorney and staff time indefinitely, plus essentially the giving over to E&B for their use of a parcel of City Yard land presently worth $11M or more In other words an approximate total city burden of $14.5M plus city expenditures of perhaps $500,000 indefinitely.  
  • However, if the electorate maintains the ban on oil drilling they'd simply owe E&B $17.5M and that amount could be paid over a period of years, ie. 30 years at "mutually agreed terms". 
All need to be reminded that the settlement agreement requires an extremely valuable 1.3 acre city parcel, with a present value of $11M or more if properly zoned, to be handed over gratis to E&B, along with $3.5M cash, if the voters approve lifting the ban on oil drilling.  

Further, all need to be reminded that the city and the school district are to be receiving relatively poor share of the hypothetical oil revenue (it should be not less than 50% in total of direct oil and gas sales revenue).  This unfortunate fact indicates that past city councils really did give away the store to Macpherson.  Why they so stupidly did that is past history.  

3-a)  The question here is, how is the city keeping track of its expenses month by month, and where can the public and the Council view and be aware of the ongoing escalating expenses in a manner, ie via a spreadsheet tabulation?  Such tabulation should clearly indicate the ongoing costs being reimbursed by E&B from their deposits fund, along with the ongoing costs being reimbursed by E&B from their deposits fund, along with the ongoing city expenditures not being reimbursed by E&B from their deposits fund.

See Item 4 Brown Act

Have The Rights of City Council Members To Speak On Their Own Been Muzzled By An Agreement?

(Please excuse my typos below)

4)  Request for clarification as to any other ongoing confidential agreements (other than the March 2, 2013 settlement agreement itself) which have also been made by the City's staff and/or the City Council, and/or with any other entity regarding the oil issue.  

The March 2012 settlement agreement between the parties states that the City will take the necessary actions to have an election for the voters to vote Yes or No on lifting the ban on oil drilling in Hermosa Beach.  However, as long as an election does take place and is facilitated by the Council, is there anything that precludes any individual council members from stating to the press or to the public, inside or outside of a public forum, and on the record, of being for or against lifting the ban on oil drilling? 

Has in any manner the rights of any individual council member to speak on their own, or on their constituents behalf, been muzzled via any agreement by the council in closed session or otherwise?  This question has not been answered clearly in my and others' view and such is not specified in the settlement agreement, nor do I recall a debate on the agenda item in any public meeting where the council specifically voted to maintain a position of unanimous support to muzzle themselves.  Something seems to be missing here and apparently has a lot do with the perception the public has of the Council regarding the entire oil matter? (See article:  Did elected officials in Hermosa Beach violate the Brown Act.)

Complicating the issue is that rumors persist that more than one council member has made it very clear to some residents or business operators that they are either supporting or not supporting lifting the ban on oil drilling in Hermosa Beach.

Unfortunately, that all five council member appear to be stonewalling, on the record, the issue of what agreement they perhaps made behind the scenes indicates to many, if not most, that the Council is being disingenuous and playing politically coy, given that the oil drilling issue is far from new in the city.

Further, it is doubtful that even 1 in 20 of the electorate who actually vote on the oil drilling issue will make up their minds one way or the other, basis reading or understanding anything of the nuts and bolts of the EIR's likely mountain of esoteric data, E&B's application, the flood of mailers and propaganda barrages to be likely put out by E&B and others, or the underlying agreements with Macpherson that have been transferred to E&B or others, nor will they perhaps understand or trust the grandiose claims of revenue one way or the other or the safety or lack of safety claims E&B and others are making.  Thus,

4-a)  Are there any agreements written or verbal other than the settlement agreement as related to the question of lifting the ban on oil drilling, the election, confidential, or otherwise, that the public and press are not distinctly and formally aware, and understanding of?  This could include any issues agreed to by the Council members among themselves, such as that they would not individually take announce a public position on oil drilling until "XYZ" occurs, etc.   If there are any other agreements please disclose and clarify as best possible what purpose they are for, why they are needed, and when they are made.

4-b)  Is each and every council member free at this time to speak his own mind regarding lifting the ban on oil drilling, both inside or outside of a public forum, and/or to the press on the record?  Yes or No?  If No, this due to a specific binding agreement made by the full council among themselves, and if so why such agreement required when the settlement agreement is supposedly the full and complete agreement?

See Hiding Oil Money Point 3  

Monday, May 27, 2013

Who Owns Present & Future Oil & Gas Mineral Rights?


1)  Request for clarification regard the present and future ownership of the oil and gas mineral rights that were own by the City prior to the original agreement(s) with Macpherson.    

1-a)  Who owns / controls the City's original oil and gas mineral rights at the present time? 
1-b)  Who will  own/control the subject mineral rights if oil drilling IS NOT APPROVED by the voters, and for how long?  
1-c)  Who will own/control the subject mineral rights if oil drilling is approved by the voters and for how long? 

2)  Request for clarification regard the Oil Lease expiration data. 

2-a)  How many years remain on that oil lease? 
2-b)  Is the clock presently ticketing on that oil lease or has it been suspended due to the prior oil litigation, and if so is it still suspended and to when? 
2-c)  If oil drilling is NOT APPROVED by the voters what happens to the oil lease, ie. does it expire immediately, will it ever expire, will the clock continue to tick? 
2-d)  If oil drilling is approved by the voters what happens to the oil lease, ie. when does it expire, will it ever expire and if so when? 

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Why Is E&B Natural Resources Calling It An "Oil Recovery" Project?


I would like to suggest to E&B management and the City of Hermosa Beach to stop misleading the residents by your faulty marketing vernacular "recovery".  Please read the definition of "recovery" because E&B does not own anything in this town.  We the residents of Hermosa Beach are smarter than 5th graders and think you should call your project what it is . . . oil drilling.

"Recovery" Definition: 
1) The action or process of regaining possession or control of something stolen or lost.
2) A return to a normal state of health, mind, or strength. E&B owns nothing in this town.

Our town is healthy, strong and has been running the just fine without oil drilling for the last 30+ years.  E&B is assuming by their use of "recovery" that they own the oil underneath the City and Ocean.  This is faulty because the State owns it in a Tide Lands Trust.

Why are you so afraid to call it drilling?  Has oil drilling become a dirty word since you are doing it in such close proximity to schools, homes, parks and businesses?  Do you think you can secretly get away with installing 70 foot tall drilling rigs in our back yards that will stretch miles underground out into the ocean?


Monday, May 20, 2013

90% of all Oil & Gas Wells are Fracked


Fracking is the process by which drillers inject millions of gallons of water, sand, salts, mud and chemicals—all too often toxic chemicals and human carcinogens such as benzene—into the ground at extremely high pressure, to fracture the rock and extract the raw fuel.  Its hard NOT to find a well in Southern California that has NOT been fracked in the last 60 years because the unregulated process has been going on for a long time.  How are we to ever know if this is what has caused the thousands of earthquakes the Midwest is now experiencing?

The fracking process is used to boost production at 90% of all oil and gas wells in the United States, according to the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, and fracking is increasingly common in other countries as well.  Although fracking most often occurs when a well is new, companies fracture many wells repeatedly in an effort to extract as much valuable oil or natural gas as possible and to maximize the return on their investment in a profitable site.

The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC), is a United States organization that represents the governors of 30 member and eight associate states, and works to ensure the nation's oil and natural gas resources are conserved and utilized to their maximum potential while protecting health, safety and the environment. It was established by the charter member states' governors in 1935. The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission is the oldest and largest interstate compact in the nation.

Fracking poses serious dangers to both human health and the environment. The three biggest problems with fracking are:
  1. Fracking is causing earthquakes in Midwest
  2. Fracking can cause adjacent older plugged wells to explode
  3. Fracking leaves behind a toxic sludge that companies and communities must find some way to manage. Safely disposing of the sludge created by fracking is an ongoing challenge.
  4. Somewhere between 20 percent and 40 percent of the toxic chemicals used in the fracking process remain stranded underground where they can, and often do, contaminate drinking water, soil and other parts of the environment that support plant, animal and human life.
  5. Methane from fracture wells can leak into groundwater, creating a serious risk of explosion and contaminating drinking water supplies so severely that some homeowners have been able to set fire to the mixture of water and gas coming out of their faucets.
In 2005, President George W. Bush exempted oil and gas companies from federal regulations designed to protect U.S. drinking water, and most state oil and gas regulatory agencies don’t require companies to report the volumes or names of the chemicals they use in the fracking process, chemicals such as benzene, chloride, toluene and sulfates.

The result, according to the nonprofit Oil and Gas Accountability Project, is that one of the nation's dirtiest industries is also one of its least regulated, and enjoys an exclusive right to "inject toxic fluids directly into good quality groundwater without oversight."

In May 2012 the California Senate defeated a bill, introduced by state Sen. Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills), requiring drillers to notify local property owners and water authorities in advance that hydraulic fracturing was going to occur, and requiring the testing of groundwater before and after the hydraulic fracturing to determine whether contamination had occurred. Pavley said that this monitoring and reporting approach would help to address citizens' concerns. The state Senate defeated the bill in a bipartisan 18-17 vote.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

A Cry For Help From More Hermosa Beach Residents

Listen to what Kevin Sousa, Michael Collins, Hany Fangary, Allan Mason and Stacey Armato have to say at the Hermosa Beach City Council meeting on Tuesday, May 14, 2013.  They are all speaking to the issue of E&B Natural Resources drilling in the Hermosa Beach City Yard without a County permit.










Related Articles:
Hermosa Beach Residents Catch E&B Drilling Without a County Permit
Hermosa Beach Patch "City Cited For Lack of Drilling Permit

E&B Natural Resources Contractors Will Be Fined For Illegal Drilling in Hermosa Beach


The City of Hermosa Beach is among three entities cited by the Los Angeles County Public Health Department--Environmental Health Drinking Water Program for drilling on the public works yard site last Tuesday without the required permits.

Brycon, LLC, a consultant out of Newport Beach, and J & H Drilling Co. Inc. out of Santa Ana were also cited for their participation in the work, which was being done on behalf of E&B Natural Resources to test soil and groundwater for contamination.

In the "Notice of Violation & Order," the city, Brycon and J & H were directed to submit a Well Permit Application by today. J & H must also submit proof of a valid California C-57 Well Water Contractor's License.

All three will also be fined, according to Richard Lavin, chief environmental health specialist with the Drinking Water Program. The fine, due by June 10th, has yet to determined, he said late Tuesday.

Permits are required for any well drilling in the state, he said. His department oversees drilling in L.A. County, with the exceptions of Long Beach and Pasadena.

Former Hermosa Beach City Manager Steve Burrell and now $168,000 consultant to EIR process did not comment.  Current Mayor of Hermosa Beach Kit Bobko creator of the illegal oil settlement had no comment.  Michael Divirgilio also did not return Hermosa Beach Patch's calls for a comment.  Current City Manager Tom Bakaly had no comment but issued the following statement below.

HERMOSA BEACH, CA - Hermosa Beach City Manager Tom Bakaly issued the following statement in response to a request from Los Angeles County for a permit for work at the city’s maintenance yard that is part of the environmental study of the oil production project proposed by E&B Natural Resources Management Corp. (E&B). 
“The work at the city’s maintenance yard involved shallow borings into the soil to obtain groundwater samples as part of the information-gathering process for the environmental review of the oil production project proposed by E&B. This is a relatively routine sampling operation for a project of this type, and it required just one day of work and little disruption of the site. While the city staff investigated the need for a state permit for the water sampling process, it was unaware that a Los Angeles County permit was needed for such work. 
“We apologize for any confusion this environmental data-gathering process might have caused. The city remains committed to providing residents and voters with thorough information about the proposed oil production project and will strive to communicate more fully in the future. As part of the ongoing communication, the City Council will receive an update at its meeting on May 28 about Hermosa Beach’s General Plan, its Community Dialogue and the environmental review process for the proposed oil production project. We invite all the city’s residents to become involved in these processes to help determine the future of Hermosa Beach.”
As is often the case after a Project Application is deemed complete, the city had asked E&B for additional information for the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) submitted as part of E&B’s Project Application. A contractor for E&B conducted shallow borings in the soil at the maintenance yard to obtain groundwater samples to address soil contamination known to exist on the site because of its historic use as a landfill. This sampling process did not constitute “testing” or sampling for oil at the site: It only sought information about groundwater and is much different from oil drilling. 
The information from this sampling will help the city gain more information about the groundwater conditions underlying the site and to better evaluate the effectiveness and appropriateness of the proposed RAP. Groundwater information also is essential for an accurate description of baseline environmental conditions in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) the city will be preparing to examine all environmental impacts of the proposed project.
The city had a license agreement with E&B that gave the company and its contractors access to the maintenance yard to obtain the samples. The work was completed on May 7. Before the work began, the city had asked and determined that no state permit was required. After the work was completed, the city became aware that the Los Angeles County Public Health Department’s Bureau of Environmental Protection required a permit and that the permit should have been obtained by the geotechnical contracting company hired by E&B. 
The city notified E&B of its responsibility to obtain the permit. E&B’s contractor has now filed for the appropriate permit with Los Angeles County.
Related Articles:
Hermosa Beach Residents Catch E&B Drilling Without a County Permit
Hermosa Beach Patch "City Cited For Lack of Drilling Permit

Monday, May 13, 2013

Kit Bobko's Long History of Wasting Taxpayer Dollars For Personal Benefit (Letter)

Not pleased with Bobko (Beach Reporter Letter April 17, 2013

Hermosa ceremonial Mayor Patrick Bobko seems intent on endowing his own shallow worth with titles and accomplishments earned by others.

Bobko received a congressional appointment to the Air Force Academy around age 18. United States taxpayers expended some $500,000 for his four-year military education with expectation Bobko would serve as a career officer. But Bobko evidently scuttled the Air Force after serving the obligatory contract time, opting instead to return to regular college for two years and acquire a “philosophy” degree, followed by yet another two college years becoming a lawyer.

With his Air Force Academy “Captain” title and lawyer title in hand, but no significant private work accomplishment, Bobko then moved to Redondo Beach after obtaining a “go-for” municipal lawyer job, essentially again on the taxpayers’ nickel at the L.A. law firm Hermosa City Attorney Michael Jenkins then worked, while that firm was contracted with Hermosa Beach.

Bobko still works there, however, after working alongside Jenkins, Bobko moved from Redondo to Hermosa Beach and made his first failed run for Hermosa Council.

Recently Bobko used expensive council meeting time to, on his own, have a photo-op presentation ceremony for an El Segundo military officer, who had won an award and actually is making a career in the Air Force, and then further used that officer to ride with Bobko for more photo-ops in Hermosa’s St Patrick’s parade.

Now Bobko is using costly council meetings to “honor” Hermosans Bobko feels have distinguished themselves. It’s more Bobko photo-ops at city expense to self-aggrandize Bobko by using those who actually have some accomplishment.

Most offensive is that after wasting expensive meeting time and taxpayer money for smiley photo-ops in this council-election year, is Bobko’s clock-watching during the actual important business of council meetings.

Howard Longacre
Hermosa Beach

See this other Howard Longacre wrote about Hypocrites Bobko & Divirgilio Rant About Transparency

E&B Drilling Proposal Will Violate a Noise Ordinance (Letter)


E&B Oil has submitted a project proposal that states an intention to create massive changes to the city of Hermosa Beach. First and foremost, they are going to ask the city to believe that they are operating a safe, honest process of harvesting oil from beneath our town and from under our ocean. Our first glimpse into what they propose to do is in having the ability to read their proposal. This proposal is peppered with city code violations. When it seems convenient to follow the code, E&B will cite such code in a highly visible way. Any intention to wiggle around this code is, at best, a parenthetical statement hidden deep inside a paragraph.

My problem begins when there are phases of the proposed project where following the code will be either inconvenient or impossible. When this is the case, the suggestion that the code will be waived, changed or violated seems to be less openly written. Once such case can be found on page 45 of the E&B Project Proposal and reads, “ The drill rig would operate continuously for 24 hours per day, seven days per week, until the appropriate depth and bottom-hole location for each well has been reached. It is estimated it would take approximately 30 days per well for each of the four wells.” This is a description of the drilling of test wells and one reinjection well. With no problems, we are looking at a minimum of 4 months of around the clock drilling and associated noise and disruption, just related to the test wells. The additional 30 wells will take 3 more years of around-the-clock drilling.

Our city municipal code has several provisions that state that this type of activity is prohibited. Specifically, in chapter 8, section 24.040, part C, the following is considered prohibited noise: “the sustained, continuous or repeated operation or use between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of any motor or engine or the repair, modification, reconstruction, testing or operation of any automobile, motorcycle, machine, contrivance, or mechanical device or other contrivance or facility unless such motor, engine, automobile, motorcycle, machine or mechanical device is enclosed within a sound insulated structure so as to prevent noise and sound from being plainly audible at the property line of the property from which the sound is emanating.” Furthermore, chapter 8, section 24.050 restricts the hours of construction from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays and states that, “ construction activity shall include site preparation, demolition, grading, excavation, and the erection, improvement, remodeling or repair of structures, including operation of equipment or machinery and the delivery of materials associated with those activities.” As a person who lives near the proposed site, and whose home (like many in the area) is above the sound attenuation wall and in the line of sight of proposed drilling rigs, equipment, vehicles, workmen, and other aspects of the project, I am highly concerned. The proposed sound attenuation wall does nothing to address the issue of noise pollution facing the majority of houses around the proposed drill site.

I am concerned that E&B Oil might already be operating under the assumption that this code will be ignored or amended for the purposes of their operation. I am concerned that any false assumption, created either by the city council, the city manager, or anyone misleading the citizens of Hermosa, will allow 24 hour a day construction and drilling, and will lead to another lawsuit. I want the citizens of Hermosa, the very citizens who will be voting about the next 35 years of our city’s future, to be informed in every step of this process.

I am presently dissatisfied with this council’s ability to clearly present information about this project.

Keep Hermosa, hermosa,
Michael Collins
Hermosa Beach

See this recent violation of City code on May 7, 2012.  

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Why is E&B Drilling in Hermosa Beach Without Permit?

I guess the joke is on us and the City can get away doing whatever they want and make up their own rules.  When will the lies, corruption and deception of the truth stop in Hermosa Beach?  This drilling started at 8am on May 7 at the Hermosa Beach City Yard.

Neighbors were not notified and the City did not have a permit to do this according to sources who asked City Manage Tom Bakaly. Is this grounds to fire a City Manager for ignoring this huge issue?  See this incident at the last City Council meeting where Tom Bakaly refuses to publish a letter.  Is Mr. Bakaly  really working for the people or is he also now working for E&B?  Why is Mr. Bakaly hiring an outside consultant to moderate / facilitate a town hall meeting?  Many questions need answers and this is not leadership.

 
City of Hermosa Beach Drilling Without a Permit?


Here is the Hermosa Beach drilling ordinance right from their web site. The drilling, boring or otherwise sinking of an oil or gas well, or oil or gas wells, or the maintenance, pumping or operation of any oil well or oil wells or gas well or gas wells in the city is declared to be a nuisance and is declared to be unlawful. It is unlawful for any person to drill, bore or otherwise sink or maintain, pump or operate or cause to be drilled, bored or otherwise sunk, or maintained, pumped or operated, or to aid in the drilling, boring or otherwise sinking, or maintaining, pumping or operating of any gas or oil well or wells for the purpose of procuring oil, gas or other hydrocarbon substances within any portion of the city. It is unlawful for any person to commence the construction or to construct or maintain any derrick, or any oil well apparatus in the city for the purpose of drilling for or maintaining any oil or gas well in the city; except, however, the oil wells now constructed or under construction or in actual operation in the city. (Ord. 95-1139 § 2, 1995; prior code § 21-10)




Reported Marina Del Rey 2.9 Earthquake on Southern California Gas Fracking Site?

The 2.9 earthquake on May 9, 2013 was in Playa del Rey on top of a Southern California Gas drilling site. Will we ever know if they were fracking? The Earthquake was reported in the media as Marina Del Rey but it was actually centered in Playa del Rey according to USGS Information.  This was right on top of a Southern California Gas Active drilling site.  

Southern California Gas Facility in Playa Del Rey

Why Did Hermosa Beach "Neighborhood Watch" Postpone Their E&B Oil Information Meeting?

Hermosa Beach Neighborhood Watch Postpones E&B Informational Meeting

A neighborhood watch meeting during which three E&B Natural Resources executives were going to present information on the company's proposed oil production project in Hermosa Beach has been postponed, according to Tracy Hopkins, Hermosa Beach resident and volunteer neighborhood watch founder.  Tracy is the co-founder and co-coordinator of the Hermosa Beach Neighborhood Watch Saferhermosabeach.com.  Safer Hermosa has a large following on Twitter at @SaferHermosa.

Ironically, Tracy was also featured on this The South Bay Show "Preparing for Disaster." The web site Safer Hermosa focuses on crime prevention and disaster preparedness.  Tracy also appears to be in the business of selling disaster preparedness kits and training programs.  She said on this show that Neighborhood Watch was inspired by watching the Katrina disaster in 2005.

HBNW receives $5,000 in funding from the city, said Tom Bakaly, city manager, adding that the $5,000 is used for National Night Out, an annual event that cities nationwide participate in in August.  Tom said the city was "kind of staying out of" the meeting and any controversy surrounding it. "This is their [neighborhood watch's] information setting," he said. "It's an informational meeting."

It does not take a genius to realize that most of the communities that have oil and gas drilling have much higher crime rates.  Go to DrillingMaps.com and you can make the obvious correlation yourself.  If oil drilling is permitted it will undoubtedly change the demographics of South Hermosa even further.  Renters will go up and so will crime rates.   

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Mira Costa High School Plugged Oil Wells at Risk of an Explosion


Maps from California Doggr Database

Capped or plugged oil wells can blowout and be a real danger in the South Bay if oil drilling is permitted in Hermosa Beach. Pat Aust of the Redondo Beach City Councilman and former firefighter knows first hand of the dangers of dealing with capped wells. Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach and Redondo beach have hundreds several capped wells that could be at risk of a blowout or explosion.  Below is an explanation to help you understand the potential threat to our community if slant hydraulic pressurized oil drilling is permitted underground and an adjacent well is pressurized.

Oil drilling blowout preventers (BOPs) can be used on the drilling site itself on the surface to mitigate risk. However, blowout preventers CANNOT be used on capped wells when the adjacent reservoir becomes pressurized.  If an adjacent capped oil well were to blowout you could easily have a methane explosion and you wouldn't know about it until its too late.

Most capped wells are buried 30 feet below the surface and were completed usually 30 to 40 years ago.  A hole still exists to a reservoir underneath the ground several thousand feet.  We don't know the condition of these capped wells or reservoirs because there are very limited records and these wells have been capped and buried for several decades.  That does not mean that these wells aren't building pressure underneath the surface.  E&B proposes slant oil drilling and it has no control over pressurizing adjacent wells.  Huge, huge risk of health and safety.   

Monday, May 6, 2013

How Many Oil and Gas Drilling Fatalities Each Year?



A chart on the number of oil drilling fatalities each year from 2007-2011, 


Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Why Is Oil & Gas Corruption Rarely Detected?


Over the next 20 years, it’s expected that oil production in California will increasing dramatically.  Yet many cities rich in oil and gas are home to some of the State's poorest people. How can this happen? Too often, wealth stays in the hands of politicians, industry insiders and local people. Revenues don’t get published and the surrounding community suffers as the quality of living goes down. Payments made to governments to exploit resources remain secret. Bribery and embezzlement go unchecked.

Many oil and gas companies protect the identities of their equity holders and subsidiaries. This allows corrupt leaders to hide stolen funds unnoticed. Inadequate financial statements make it easy to disguise corrupt deals, and impossible for any of us to monitor them. Many oil and gas companies don’t publish information by state and city. This allows them to hide the royalties, taxes and fees they pay. But without this information, we can’t hold governments to account for the money they receive.

The entire oil and gas industry spent on average $400,000 each day lobbying senators and representatives to weaken public health safeguards and keep big oil tax breaks, totaling nearly $150 million.

Stolen oil and gas income has terrible consequences and is widespread through the United States and World. It benefits an elite few. But for everyone else, it fuels conflict over resources and health and safety.  The solution?  Would you trust these people based on their track record?  Here is our list of suspicious E&B Natural Resources deals.  Submit your anonymous suspicious below under discussion . . .  
comments powered by Disqus