Carson Bans New Oil Drilling to Stop Occidental's Proposed 200 Slant Well Drilling Project

Carson City Council Meeting Bans Fracking & New Oil Drilling Projects

The Carson City Council on Wednesday unanimously 5-0 approved a 45-day moratorium on new oil and gas drilling (LA Times), largely due to concerns about hydraulic fracking. The moratorium blocks Occidental Petroleum plans to start drilling more than 200 new slant drilling wells. The company initially said it planned to employ fracking techniques, which inject water, sand and chemicals deep underground at high pressure. The pressure breaks apart rock in an effort to release more oil and gas. That drew opposition from Carson community activists concerned about the potential impact of fracking on air and water quality. In recent weeks, the company has said it wouldn’t use fracking because test wells indicated that it likely would not increase production. Who are you supposed to believe?

But council members said the moratorium would give them time to consider additional regulations. "There are too many questions, too many unknowns and too many possible bad consequences that could result from the city engaging in this activity," said Councilman Albert Robles, according to a Reuters report of the meeting. Robles said the City Council will consider a one-year moratorium after the 45-day period is completed. Carson’s decision follows a Los Angeles City Council's vote on Feb. 28 to pursue a moratorium on fracking and injection wells.

Click Here to Review Details of Pins Carson Oil Drilling Issues

Where are Carson residents, students and business people organizing on Facebook or social media to fight this? 

Why Are Home Prices Dropping in Hermosa Beach?

Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach & El Segundo 

Condo Townhomes Average Price Per Sale & Sold 

(Click Image to Enlarge)

Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach & El Segundo 

Single Family Home Average Price Per Sale & Sold 

(Click Image to Enlarge)

E&B has been making their rounds presenting to local real estate groups over the past week about the economic benefits of oil drilling in our Beach town. They will spew a truck load of BS and have already costs Hermosa Beach property owners about approximately $343M in aggregate real estate wealth in the first 15 months of being in town.  Here is the math = (7000 parcels x $980,000 avg. per parcel) -5% decrease to be conservative. The last 12 months have seen a sharp spike in home prices everywhere in the South Bay but Hermosa Beach.

Unfortunately, the Stop of Hermosa Beach group has not been invited to present the other side of the oil story. If you ask anyone from E&B if slant hydraulic oil drilling can be done safely near the thousands of abandoned wells in the South Bay, E&B will lie and refer to studies or experts. However, ask any other experienced oil executive and they will tell you that E&B is nuts to hydraulic drill with capped wells under homes nearby.

Slant hydraulic drilling cannot be done safely with abandoned wells under homes and schools. Ask E&B if they plan to cover abandoned wells in the EIR? It won't because Marine Research has no experience with with their failed EIR's for Whittier Hills and Baldwin Hills. If they cover how to mitigate an abandoned well becoming pressurized in the EIR it will kill the whole project and E&B knows this. This is also a fact!  

KCAL9 CBS Story "Oil Drilling Proposal in Hermosa Beach"

Stacey Armato, Michael Collins from StopHermosaBeachOil.com
No Comment From E&B Natural Resources

Thank You Serene Branson from KCAL 9 

E&B did not comment on this story because news publicity is last they want in the Los Angeles area. E&B is attempting to take advantage of a vulnerable town and quietly drill into the Santa Monica Bay without waking up the powerful media groups that will make this a huge National story. The oil drilling proposal is not a story about 18,000 Hermosa Beach residents but more about maintaining the lifestyle of 11 million people that enjoy the cool breezes from Santa Monica Bay.  Its about jeapardizing the integrity of thousands of plugged oil wells under homes in Redondo Beach, Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach that could leak and explode if they are come under pressure from new hydraulic drilling nearby.

This illegal settlement agreement was constructed by Hermosa Beach City Council Member Kit Bobko and he is obviously nervous in this video above doing his first TV interview on the topic.  He will be forced to defend the illegal Hermosa Beach oil settlement it in order to save his political career.  Look at Kit Bobko's horrendous environmental voting record.  Watch these videos below which show Hermosa Beach City Council hypocrisy, lies, deception & intimidation.

Mira Costa High School Plugged Oil Wells at Risk of an Explosion

Maps from California Doggr Database

Capped or plugged oil wells can blowout and be a real danger in the South Bay if oil drilling is permitted in Hermosa Beach. Pat Aust of the Redondo Beach City Councilman and former firefighter knows first hand of the dangers of dealing with capped wells. Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach and Redondo beach have hundreds several capped wells that could be at risk of a blowout or explosion.  Below is an explanation to help you understand the potential threat to our community if slant hydraulic pressurized oil drilling is permitted underground and an adjacent well is pressurized.

Oil drilling blowout preventers (BOPs) can be used on the drilling site itself on the surface to mitigate risk. However, blowout preventers CANNOT be used on capped wells when the adjacent reservoir becomes pressurized.  If an adjacent capped oil well were to blowout you could easily have a methane explosion and you wouldn't know about it until its too late.

Most capped wells are buried 30 feet below the surface and were completed usually 30 to 40 years ago.  A hole still exists to a reservoir underneath the ground several thousand feet.  We don't know the condition of these capped wells or reservoirs because there are very limited records and these wells have been capped and buried for several decades.  That does not mean that these wells aren't building pressure underneath the surface.  E&B proposes slant oil drilling and it has no control over pressurizing adjacent wells.  Huge, huge risk of health and safety.   

Where is the Leadership on the Hermosa Beach City Council?

Where Do You Stand City Council?

1. Allowing an oil company to drill for the next 30 to 40 years?
2. 3500 trucks rolling into town? 
3. 8,000 barrels of oil refined on site
4. 250,000 cubic feet of gas refined on site?
5. Injection wells underneath the ocean?

Capped Oil Wells Beneath Homes & Ocean Can Blowout

Capped Oil Wells That Could Blowout in Redondo Beach & Hermosa Beach

Capped oil wells are a real danger in the South Bay.  Pat Aust the Redondo Beach City Councilman and former firefighter knows first hand of the dangers.  Hermosa Beach has a handful of capped wells and some are out in the Ocean as you can see.  However, Redondo Beach has hundreds of them underneath homes and Manhattan Beach has plugged oil wells at Mira Costa High School.  Here is an explanation to help you understand the potential threat to our community if slant hydraulic pressurized oil drilling is permitted underground.

Oil drilling blowout preventers (BOPs) can be used on the drilling site itself on the surface to mitigate risk.  However, blowout preventers CANNOT be used on capped wells or adjacent wells underground & in the Ocean.   If an adjacent capped oil well were to blow on the ocean seabed it would cause a massive oil spill and mess on up and down the coast.  The ocena seabed well could be capped but would required significant emergency effort (like the BP Spill in the Gulf) and would change the integrity of life in the South Bay as we know it.  If an adjacent capped oil were to blow underground beneath homes.  Lives and homes could be lost because an explosion is highly likely.  Residents in Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach who own homes over a capped underground well would never know about the problem until it is too late.  Do we really want to trust the that the integrity of the well was capped properly 30 or 40 years ago?

Crude oil is a flammable liquid consisting of a complex mixture of hydrocarbons of various molecular weights that are found in geologic formations beneath the Earth's surface. Because hydrocarbons and gas are lighter than rock or water, they often migrate upward through adjacent rock layers until either reaching the surface or becoming trapped within porous rocks (known as reservoirs) by impermeable rocks above. However, the process is influenced by underground water flows, causing oil to migrate hundreds of kilometres horizontally or even short distances downward before becoming trapped in a reservoir. When hydrocarbons are concentrated in a trap, an oil field forms, from which the liquid can be extracted by drilling and pumping at high pressure. The down hole pressures experienced at the rock structures change depending upon the depth and the characteristic of the source rock.  The deeper the well the more risky the operation.  E&B is proposing deep wells.

Blowouts happen all the time and are daily occurrence in the oil industry.  Don't convince yourself it can't happen here because Steve Layton knows too well from his Blowout in Louisiana which bankrupted Equinox Oil.

Here is another conclusion that supports this argument from the Coastal Commission.

Hypocrisy of Councilmen Kit Bobko & Michael Divirgilio

Listen to Hypocrites Bobko & Divirgilio Rant About Transparency

Smart financial move - Beach Reporter Letter From Howard Longacre - October 18, 2012

During the Oct. 9 Hermosa Beach City Council meeting, all concerned had to again endure the self-righteous, condescending, bullying insults and obstruction from Councilmen Michael DiVirgilio and Patrick Bobko regarding a revised banking relationship with the Bank of America.

These two sneaky councilmen owning no property, home, or business in Hermosa Beach, having no historical roots in the South Bay, having both moved and rented units here after briefly renting in Redondo (obviously to use Hermosa Beach for their political self-aggrandizement) have both, more than worn out their welcome.

DiVirgilio and Bobko's badgering questions and ridicule on Oct. 9, nauseously mocked a well-researched revision to the long-neglected banking contract. Hermosa Beach will now see its present $24,000 yearly banking charges completely eliminated. And additionally with new cash credits to be received into Hermosa's account; a net savings to Hermosa's treasury of over $140,000 during the next five years, and without a necessity of expending $75,000 to change banks.

DiVirgilio and Bobko insulted virtually everyone with their pre-planned, disgusting and despicable attacks. They seemingly even elicited an Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce (conveniently a local officer of a banking corporation appropriately rejected from consideration) to complain at the meeting.

DiVirgilio and Bobko's attempt to deceive and manipulate the minds of the public and press with their disingenuous drivel regarding "transparency" and process, was just more illustration of their increasingly offensive and self-serving behavior that wastes and disrupts council meetings costing several thousand dollars per hour.

Much appreciation for this successful new banking contract belongs to Mayor Jeff Duclos, Councilman Peter Tucker, Councilman Howard Fishman, Interim City Manager John Jalili, City Manager Tom Bakaly, the city's finance department staff including the deputy city treasurer, and especially City Treasurer and the financial officials of neighboring cities and agencies who freely gave of their expertise and wisdom.

Howard Longacre 

Bobko and Divirgilio are the same two guys that negotiated (without a public hearing) a deal that is not legal and they have conflicts of interest along with other City officials.  The hypocrisy of Hermosa Beach City Councilmen Kit Bobko and Michael Divirgilio is appalling.  Only 1 only company bid on the deal and they made the city borrow $17.5M with no public forum or RFP. A grand jury needs to investigate what is behind their confidentiality agreement. This video is from the Octorber 9, 2012.  Read more on the top reason this is a bad oil deal for Hermosa Beach.

The City Treasurer was anything but nontransparent taking bids from 19 banks and shared it with the public?   You took a bid on the oil deal from a friend Gary Brutcsh who sourced the deal to you?  Transparency?  Your untrustworthy voting record also speaks for itself.

Request for Open Forum to Discuss Illegal Deal Denied

Its a Legal Issue and Not a Voter Issue

Oil Companies Do NOT have to Disclose Fracking Sites in CA

Fracking is Still Highly Unregulated in California
See the Fracking Health Dangers of Gas Here


Baldwin Hills Oil Sink Hole in 1963 See (6 min 25 seconds)
Pressurized Oil Extraction Wells Caused This

Hydraulic Fracking Diagram

California Fracking Unregulated

E&B Oil Reveals Hydraulic Pumping Will Be Used

E&B further explains their hydraulic fracking technique using 27 oil wells and 3 water injection wells. The drilling rig will be 87 feet tall and will be temporarily on site for four months before it is removed. During that four month period three exploratory wells and one water injection well will be drilled. This will allow us to analyze the quality, along with the rate and flow, and other important factors of the produced oil, gas and water.

Pressurized Hydraulic Oil Extraction Wells Caused This
Redondo Beach Wins $2.5M Law Suit From Oil Companies in 1997

Eight oil companies named in the lawsuit were required to replace the oil they had taken with pressurized water. He said that because they did not, the surface under the water sank up to four feet in some areas. The subsidence led the breakwater to sink four feet below its designed height of 22 feet, Goddard said, and caused storm-generated waves to crash over the protective wall. He said the storm caused more than $8 million in damage to local businesses, a cost absorbed by the city. Several major oil companies were named in the suit, including Texaco, Exxon, Trident and Phillips Petroleum, Goddard said. 

Hermosa Beach City Council Voting Record

Hermosa Beach City Council Voting Record

Kit Bobko & Michael Divirgilio are the dissenting votes or absent for all of these City Council Meeting votes?  

1)  Voted 3-2 No on Outsourcing Parking Meters

2)  Voted 3-2 Yes Hiring Tom Bakaly as new City Manager

3)  Voted 3-2 Yes to Ban Polystyrene
4)  Voted 4-1 Yes Banning Smoking on Strand & Pier Plaza
5)  Voted 4-0 Yes (Bobko Absent) Banning Smoking on Beaches
6)  Voted 3-2 Yes Approval of Bank of American Banking contract
6)  Voted 3-2 No Suspend City Treasurer Cohn who was a victim of extortion.

Oil Drilling Settlement Negotiations

The City Council seems to have a clear divide on most voting issues in recent months as described above.  However, I often have to scratch my head to understand the logic behind some of the dissenting votes in recent months.  Bobko and Divirgilio are clearly working as a team and it all seemed to culminate immediately after both launched a PR campaign to promote their oil settlement.  The big question is:  Why were the two of these guys negotiating our oil settlement deal together?  Shouldn't they have had Duclos, Fishman or Tucker in the room negotiating? Neither Bobko or Divirgilio own a home in Hermosa Beach.  It would have been impossible for a third City Councilman to participate in the negotiations because it would have been in violation of the Brown Act.  Were the residents represented properly?  I don't think so.  What business, lobbyists or people are motivating these two individuals to make make their voting decisions or press their unpopular agendas?

Outsourcing Parking Meters vs Replacing With Credit Card Machines

I think many residents who are disappointing about the City not even considering outsourcing are missing the point of Duclos, Fishman and Tucker voting no.  However, the City can always outsourcing at any point in time but lets take some baby steps and install credit card machines that we own first.  Some of the high salary and union problems might naturally go away over time.  90% of the problems can be solve by installing credit card machines and that does not require outsourcing.   The City currently collects $2.5M per year from coins and who knows we might be about to double this to $5M simply by putting in credit card machines and managing the price per spot during peak hours.  What if we charge $5 per hour for parking near the pier during peak hours.  Hint, hint . . .  this might control some of the alcohol related problems of people flooding into our city.  Controlling our own meters with credit cards is not that hard and Manhattan Beach has already demonstrated they can do it profitably.

Kit made faulty parallel assumptions that it works for Newport Beach, why not in Hermosa?  His PR was recognized in the national media blaming $100,000 meter maids as the problem?  Why did Kit conveniently leave out that installing credit card machines would have $0 cost to the city and would be profitable immediately.  This does not require outsourcing.  So, what his suggestion to outsource politically motivated or does he have the best interest of our city at heart?  Does he or his law firm RWG have any political ties to the large outsourcing firms that manage parking meters?  Does Kit once again have a conflict of interest he would like to explain?  Was he motivated to get a "deal" in return for some political donations down the road.

Kit routinely makes statements and negotiates deals that are not backed with any financial analysis.  Kit also does not appear to see the big financial picture or have a cohesive fiscal strategy as it relates to the affect on the community.  Kit is not a property owner and has no skin in the game.  He simply seems to look for revenue opportunities or ways to save money to further his political platform.  I wish Kit would simply more rational decision based on what is right for the community and not based a political ideology.  I am a conservative voter and thinker myself, however, I don't agree with much Kit's thinking or ideas as they pertain to what is best for our community.   

Councilmen Howard Fishman said the city should move immediately on replacing coin-operated meters with credit card parking meters to solve 90% of the problems. City Treasurer wrote a memorandum to the council encouraging the installation of credit card-accepting meters as other municipalities have done in order to increase funds and efficiency.  “With credit card meters, revenue goes up overnight,” Pete Tucker said.   Former Police Chief Greg Savelli, who now runs the parking enforcement department of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, also spoke against outsourcing, saying the service the officers provide “goes beyond the balance sheet.”

“What we have now is fantastically expensive,” Kit Bobko said who seems adamant about cutting costs and saving money no matter what the outcome.  Outsourcing to save money or outsourcing to generate (oil drilling) is going to be a common platform for Kit to propel himself to a higher political office.  Kit gave no credible financial arguments justifying his outsourcing position.

Hiring Hermosa Beach City Manager Tom Bakaly

"First, let me say that I think without question that Tom was an impressive dude, and I think that he provides a lot of earned and demonstrated skills that meet our needs and that match quite nicely with our uniqueness," said Councilman Michael DiVirgilio.  Council votes 3-2.

"In Hermosa Beach, we're whistling past the graveyard because we are not having any financial troubles yet,” Bobko said. “We weren't going to stand firm and ask of our leader, the person who is in charge of our city's staff, to do what we want the staff to do, which is to pay for his own first contribution. That is deeply disappointing and I think a failure of leadership for this council…

I don't think either of these guys have much experience running a business or hiring and firing people.  My philosophy has always been to hire the best CEO you can get and pay him top dollar.  There are a lot of problems in the City right now and we need a strong, competent, financially oriented person to do the job.  I am confident Tom Bakaly was a great hire and will help turn the City around that has been neglected in many areas.

Banning Polystyrene in Hermosa Beach

Bobko and Divirgilio have been routinely voting together.  Bobko is a Registered Republican and Divirgilio seems to be a Democrat having worked for Jane Harmon.  However, the two of them seem to be singing to the same song when it comes to local voting matters.  They also don't seem to be able to sway the other 3 council members very often on their views.  Both Bobko and Divirgilio were dissenting votes (3-2_ as well on Hermosa Beach polystyrene ban.   This was shocking since Michael Divirgilio once led the Green Task Force in Hermosa Beach and pounded the table in his campaign about a City that needs to become "carbon neutral".

Banning Smoking on Strand, Pier Plaza & Beaches

It goes without saying who was the lone voter in the 4-1 vote to ban smoking on the Pier and Stand. Kit Bobko does not support banning smoking on the Pier or Strand.  Kit Bobko was also conveniently absent for the 4-0 that banned smoking on the beaches.  Does he have your health at interest or his political views?

Hermosa Beach Renegotiates Banking Contract First Time Ever Recorded

Bank of America has been the Bank of Hermosa Beach for over 40+ years. It would have cost the City over $100,000 to change banks.  Also, Treasurer Cohn renegotiated the current contract for the first time ever and was not touched by John Workman prior Treasurer.   Hermosa Beach was paying $24,000 per year in banking service fees and a $28,000 rebate?

Bobko and Divirgilio Accuse Treasurer Cohn of Sloppy Non-Transparent Work?

Sloppy?  Transparency?  Do Mr. Divirgilio and Mr. Bobko have a personal issue with Treasurer Cohn?  Aren't they being hypocritical about the City Treasurer lacking transparency in the bank bidding process of 12 banks? Correct me if I am wrong but you are the same to 2 councilmen that negotiated a $17.5M settlement with any transparency and 1 oil company? They seem to think the backroom oil deal is justified because of the ongoing litigation but you did brought in a 3rd party without any bidders. Their lack of due diligence and transparency on this deal is appalling and speaks for itself. We are talking about saving money in a banking relationship of $50,000 per year in banking fees vs a $17.5M check they wrote without any bidders while jeopardizing the health and safety of its citizens. I think the two of them have some explaining to do.  Their hypocritical voting record speaks for itself.   E&B loaned the City of HB $30M to settle the lawsuit with Macpherson. How many companies got to bid on this? Only 1 company sourced by Gary Brutsch and Michael Divirgilo and Kit Bobko. Why doesn't the LA Times investigate this?

Former City Manager Steve Burrell Unretires to Manage Oil EIR

Steve Burrell's Retirement Party Two Months Ago April 5, 2012

At the May 22, 2012 City Council Meeting, City Officials are set to approve a Professional Services Agreements with Ed Almanza & Associates and Stephen R. Burrell for consulting services to augment staff in processing land use entitlements and an Environmental Impact Report in connection with an oil drilling project.

Here is a letter to the City Council regarding this consulting agreement from long time resident Barbara Guild who beat oil drilling in 1957.  Barbara Guild has also done an extensive review on the agreement signed by Hermosa Beach and suggest that you read her oil agreement comments here.

Barbara Guild's Letter to City Council of Hermosa Beach

Dear Mayor Duclos, Councilman Fishman, Councilman Tucker, Councilman DiVirgilio, Councilman Bobko,

STOP and THINK before you go forward tonight and inappropriately approve not one, but two of the following items:  “Agreements for Consulting Services to Augment Staff in processing Land Use Entitlements and an Environmental Impact Report in Connection with an Oil Drilling Project.” DO NOT VOTE FOR THESE TWO AGREEMENTS!!! 

I have lived in Hermosa Beach for 64 years, and I am very interested in maintaining the flavor as well as the environment of our city. I actively defeated the Shell Oil Co. in their proposal to drill for oil in our tidelands in 1957. And I spoke to the Council, March13th, following the signing of the current agreement with E & B, where I stated that we are now starting with a clean slate and must realize this fact. 

The people of Hermosa Beach should be allowed to know which firms are bidding for the opportunity of preparing the necessary Environmental Impact Report. It should not be given to the first group that comes along. Allow those of us who are most interested in protecting our environment to come up with suggestions of who to engage. We have many environmental issues that need addressing, and a two-man group from Orange County, with no office on record, only a P. O. Box, should not be signed up without further consideration and public input.

The Settlement Agreement you signed, March 2, 2012, limits, to $50,000, the amount of money E & B will provide to reimburse the City for only these THREE items from (Paragraph 4.4 a):

1) The EIR,

2) The CEQA 

3) The Election to rescind the Oil Drilling Ban.

Former City Manager, Steve Burrell could earn $168,000 for each fiscal year (plus expenses), and the preliminary estimate for Almanza & Associates is $138,000. This would leave nothing to pay for the election, if it’s ever called.   Do you really think that E & B is going to pay for the contracts you might sign tonight? Please seriously consider your vote!

Yours sincerely, Barbara Guild

P.S. Here is Paragraph 4.4 of the March 2, 2012 Agreement the City made with E & B:

4.4 a. E & B’s Obligations Following Closing a. Reimburse City for the cost of preparation of an environmental impact report or supplemental environmental impact report (EIR) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on a Project description provided by E & B, should such an EIR be prepared and the cost of conducting a special election NOT TO EXCEED $50,000 as provided in Paragraph 4.6 (a). (Emphasis added). We are concerned why the city staff would need "assistance with processing the development application and other necessary entitlements" since this is a technical and straightforward procedure that shouldn't require a specialist consultant to accomplish. Unfortunately, Mr. Burrell placed a political cloud over his head by choosing to retire when he did. Had he stayed on longer, this contract would not be necessary. Although the city is not paying for his services, it has the appearance of double-dipping. Those opposing oil development will make hay of this which may very well distract from the serious issues of determining the safety of this project and proposed financial return to the city.

We would like to hear some details on why these people were chosen and what their qualifications and expectations are.  This comes from City Officials like Michael Divirgilio who is sounding the horn on more public transparency which I think is good.  Some questions I have for these individuals:

1) What are the details of this consulting agreement?

2)  How much are they getting paid and by Hermosa Beach?

3)  What is their history with the project, E&B, oil or lawsuit?

4)  What is their professional experience managing processes like this?

5)  Do Steve Burrell or Ed Almanza have any conflicts of interest?

6)  How will this facilitate the promise from City Council about making the EIR process public?

7)  Are any city residents involved in the EIR process?

8) Why are the we, the citizens, paying for this? Why isn't this cost being underwritten by the oil company? Or are we concerned that if they pay for it we won't get legitimate answers?

Please add your comments here. 

How is Fracking Different from Oil Drilling?

How is hydraulic fracturing different from drilling for oil? And why is it called 'fracking'? CNN explains it to you.  CNN Explains.

The Environmental Protection Agency's new air pollution rules for the oil and gas industry may seem like odd timing, as President Obama has been trying to deflect Republican criticism that he overregulates energy industries. But the rules weren't the Obama administration's idea.  How a 'Western Problem' Led to New Drilling Rules.

Listen to this when you consider that E&B Oil wants to drill 30 wells in Hermosa Beach.  30 wells getting well completion in our neighborhood would horrendous.  The EPA has proposed new rules to control the problem but does this apply to slant oil drilling?

The fact that the EPA has acknowledged drilling is making people sick is a strong argument against doing so in the midst of a residential neighborhood, like Hermosa Beach. "The EPA says all of that drilling sends significant amounts of pollution into the air, contributing to smog and making people sick."

Hermosa Beach Slant Oil Drilling Maps

These maps are speculative drawings based in information we have gathered from the Macpherson proposals.  E&B oil has not submitted their drilling proposal yet.  

Map of the proposed Hermosa Beach slant oil drilling site will reach out into the ocean.  What is slant oil drilling?  The drilling will also go underground into Redondo Beach likely.  The California Coastal Commission has full authority of this drilling and has thus tidelands restrictions on where money from oil can be spent.  The oil site will also be less than 100 feet from homes when Colorado requires a 350 foot setback and California recommend 300 feet.

Do we really know what is underground nor want to disturb the environment with oil drilling pipes possibly poking through the ocean floor?  Do want want to risk the dangers of the ocean floor and our beaches sinking (subsiding)?

The proposed drilling site effects more than 50% of residents of Hermosa Beach.  Noise, air pollution, explosions or dangerous gases are all a potential consequence.  Not to mention the drilling site will be within a few hundred yards of your kids playing in the park.  If you run on the greenbelt in Manhattan Beach or Hermosa Beach there could be an oil pipeline to under it to Chevron Refinery in Torrance and/or a natural gas pipeline AES Power Plant in Redondo Beach.

Lets not forget about the fault line that runs across the Santa Monica Bay and the South Bay.  We have had several earthquakes offshore in Hermosa Beach and Santa Moncia bay in the past few years. 

 27 oil wells and 3 water injection wells for Fracking and Natural Gas

Horrible Air Quality

I am told by oil experts in the business that the odor from gases and drilling will be "awful" around the site.  There is no way to contain the odor or poisonous gases that come up our of the ground.  This map depicts 3 different wind scenarios we get in the area.  An onshore, offshore and no wind where the smell and gases get trapped in the valley.

Emissions generated during the drilling/development phase include vehicle emissions; diesel emissions from large construction equipment and generators, storage/dispensing of fuels, and, if installed at this stage, flare stacks; small amounts of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulates from blasting activities; and dust from many sources, such as disturbing and moving soils (clearing, grading, excavating, trenching, backfilling, dumping, and truck and equipment traffic), mixing concrete, and drilling. During windless conditions (especially in areas of thermal inversion), project-related odors may be detectable at more than a mile from the source.  Excess increases in dust could decrease forage palatability for wildlife and livestock and increase the potential for dust pneumonia.  See source.

250 Yard Heavy Impact Zone from Noise, Odor, Dangerous Gases and Explosions.   There are two parks, hundreds of homes and a jogging trail in the vicinity which I think is disgraceful.   There are probably 10+ kids under the age of 10 years old that live in the red boxed area.  Its just sad that no one thought through the ramifications.  

Projected Ripple Affect of Real Estate Losses

This is a Scenario of What Could Happen

comments powered by Disqus

A Blessing From The Heavens?

Read These 3 Daily Breeze Article Quotes With A Barf Bag in Hand 

Mayor Howard Fishman said. "We stopped the bleeding. It's the greatest accomplishment this council has done since I've been on it."

Gary Brutsch was a councilman in 1984, when voters approved two Macpherson-backed initiatives allowing drilling. And it was a chance encounter in December with Don Macpherson, his former neighbor, on a flight to Hawaii that paved the way for settlement negotiations to rekindle. Brutsch, a South Bay Realtor, said of the settlement. "At the very least, it has limited the city's liability. I think it was absolutely a blessing from the heavens."

"When you look at technology, and ask, "Is it dangerous?' The answer is not really," Ershaghi said. "People may worry because they are not sure of what the consequences are. The technology is there to make the project safe, it's just a matter of making sure rules and regulations are followed."

Just to be crystal clear, I am NOT questioning Doug Morino the Reporter who did a great job on the article.  Kudos to him for doing a lot of homework.  More to come I am sure.  Read this entire story from the Daily Breeze.

Ask Mayor Howard Fishman Lunch on Tuesday

Networking Lunch at Fritto Misto in Hermosa Beach on Tuesday, March 13 at 11:30 AM.  Lets get some more information out to the public while we eat some tasty garlic bread and bruschetta.  We attended the lunch and was struck be a number of erroneous statements the Mayor made about revenues, timing of the vote and some important legal details.  It is clear that he did not understand the agreement he signed and think this is why large agreements like this should not be negotiated and signed in a backroom without public comment.  Our Hermosa Beach City Council is obviously being told what to say by the oil company and a paid PR agency.  Are they really working for us?  Why are they under a confidentiality agreement?